In the fields of Systems Engineering and Computers and Information Technology, research activities are continuously aligned with the highest quality standards, promoting scientific rigor, innovation, and academic ethics.
Quality evaluation within SD-AC is a multi-criteria process designed to monitor both the progress of each student’s doctoral path and the overall performance of supervising academic staff. Monitoring is carried out based on national standards defined by CNATDCU, ARACIS indicators, and internal self-evaluation procedures. This rigorous framework ensures that defended theses make a genuine, original, and internationally visible contribution through publications in leading journals and recognized prestigious conferences.
The final evaluation of doctoral theses results in a rating awarded by the public defense committee. The ratings that may be assigned to a thesis are: “Excellent” (Summa cum laude), “Very Good” (Magna cum laude), “Good” (Cum laude), or “Satisfactory”.
Through the strict application of performance criteria, compliance with the National Qualifications Framework (NQF), and the promotion of a transparent and ethical academic environment, the Doctoral School of Automatic Control and Computers (SD-AC) maintains its leading role in the advanced training of experts and researchers in engineering sciences.